Monday, March 23, 2015

Are Coaches Too Tough or are Athletes Too Sensitive?

Allie McDavitt 

Ohio State’s women’s hockey coach, Nate Handrahan, recently resigned “instead of being fired for violating the university’s sexual harassment, inappropriate conduct and retaliation” policies (Stein & Jones, 2015, para. 3). An investigation was done and witnesses reported Handrahan frequently “used sexually explicit or vulgar language during practices and games” (Stein & Jones, 2015, para. 7).  It was also reported that Handrahan belittled the players with many of them describing him as a “bully.”  The coaching staff described Handrahan’s coaching style as “direct,” “intense,” and “committed” and stated he did not threaten the players. Handrahan denied using inappropriate or sexually explicit language (Stein & Jones, 2015, para. 10). Ultimately, the university’s review found sufficient evidence of the coach’s policy violations. Before the investigation began, Handrahan had received written reprimand by the university after he missed the team bus to the airport and showed up to the airport “intoxicated and unprofessional” (Stein & Jones, 2015, para. 4).


            Handrahan completed his fourth season with the team. In his most recent performance review he received an overall “meets expectations” and was acknowledged for improving student welfare and academic success of the program. He was even awarded a raise in his salary.


            It is interesting that the university was very satisfied with his performance as a coach last May then not even a year later he is no longer working with the program at all. Some controversy is being brought up over his resignation. Many believe the athletes are being sensitive; bringing up the fact that the men’s hockey team probably hears much worse language during their practices. Collegiate athletics, especially division I universities, are extremely competitive. Coaches are going to be tough and push these athletes to their limits. But what is too far? At what point is being a “tough coach” considered unethical? Is it okay for coaches to use sexually explicit language when trying to get a point across? Is it okay for men’s teams to endure that treatment? Would the coach of a men’s team experience the same outcome in a similar situation?

References:
Stein, R & Jones, T. (2015, March 12). Complaints of sexual harassment prompt resignation of Ohio State’s women’s hockey coach. The Columbus Dispatch. Retrieved from http://buckeyextra.dispatch.com/content/stories/2015/03/12/0311-osu-resignation.html

6 comments:

  1. Handrahan is not the first, and will definitely not be the last coach to use questionable language while coaching. In my opinion, a coach’s coaching style is deeply rooted in morals. If a coach has skewed morals, the way he/she interacts and communicates with his/her team will be different than a coach who has good morals.

    I believe that both men and women’s teams should encompass coaches who are positive and enlighten the team. A coach who demeans his/her players is unethical regardless of the gender of the team. No athlete should have to endure treatment from a coach that is anything but beneficial and encouraging.

    A “tough coach” is someone who is able to motivate his/her team by improving skills, team comradery, physical condition, and playing dynamic. This type of coach is able to motivate players through mental preparedness and perseverance, not with excessive yelling or using swear words. A coach that creates an environment where athletes are reluctant and timid is unethical and should not be tolerated. Any allegation of sexual harassment, inappropriate conduct, or retaliation should be immediately investigated and handled accordingly based upon the outcome of the findings.

    Kali Morgenstern

    ReplyDelete
  2. I second Kali's opinion about Handrahan not being the first or last coach to use this kind of language.Just last week I posted about coach Stallings from Vanderbilt being caught on camera using violent and profane language. Every coach has a uni9que way of conveying their message to their players.

    Handrahan is in his 4th season which means almost every player on the team was scouted and recruited by him and his staff. The players should have had an idea of what they were getting into by asking players on the team at the time.

    I do think that the issue becomes greater because it is a male coach dealing with female athletes using sexually explicit comments. It is really a debate over equal rights with males and females if he is being viewed more harshly because he coaches females. With Title IX calling for a fair playing field, I think it's fine that female athletes deal with certain coaches who are similar on the men's side. A great example is Coach Auriema at UCONN.

    Eric Vendemia

    ReplyDelete
  3. Different ways of motivating players especially on a large team can put a coach in a tough situation. In some regards I see Handrahan establishing a culture and I agree with Kali that Men's teams probably hear worse language. In my opinion I can understand cussing and trying to push the athlete more. I do not agree with using sexually explicit comments.
    Today I think you see more "soft" athletes. They have been babied their entire life and the first time they get yelled at they shut down. From an athlete perspective you should know and understand the coaching style you are getting yourself into. If you are not comfortable with a coach that sets those standards high and can be more intense or use bad language you shouldn't go to that school. As a coach you also need to evaluate your team and understand the kids you are able to be more intense with and those that will shut down. It is also a two way street.

    Courtney Cox

    ReplyDelete
  4. This case is not the first time we are hearing about an intercollegiate athletic coach who has received a lot of speculation due to explicit language and questionable conduct. Mike Rice, from Rutgers University is someone who comes to mind when thinking about unethical conduct that affects student-athletes. The actions of Rice and Handrahan are unacceptable no matter who they are coaching, male or female. The question should not be is it okay for males to endure the inappropriate coaching styles but not women. The consensus needs to be that this type of unethical and immoral behavior will not be tolerating at universities.

    I understand and agree that there is a time and a place for “tough love” and tough coaching but that passion and desire to win and be great should not come at the expense of slurs and condescending remarks. You can build tough athletes without swearing and usually sexually explicit remarks. If you lead with respect and honor you will have athletes who “buy in” to your coaching philosophy instead of athletes who are offended, hurt and timid from all the cruel remarks.

    Marissa Tashenberg

    ReplyDelete
  5. I totally agree with what has been written in previous comments, that coaches should refrain from using bad languages. One argument I have often heard from coaches to justify their yelling and language is that they do it to motivate their players. However, I have experienced that a furious coach on the sideline rather had the opposite effect on me, in that it intimidated me more than it pushed me.

    On the other hand, I understand that sport is a field where a very direct language is required. While talking to players during a game or practices there is no time to be “polite”(i.e. coaches usually do not say “please” and “thank you”). While coaching I have often experienced that kids felt offended, as soon they were criticized in a more direct language. I guess, getting used to this direct approach is what has often been referred to as “mental toughness”. As long as no explicit language is used and as long the dignity of players is not hurt, a coach should have the right to be direct.

    Andreas

    ReplyDelete
  6. There have been many incidents over the past decade about coaches being too hard on players. I have heard many stories about crazy coaches attacking players physically and mentally. Being a member on a collegiate team and having two different head coaches throughout my career I’ve seen it all. One coach I had who was a male was all about being intense and getting up close and personal with our team. My other coach was more supportive and not as mean. While I’ve never experience a coach who I hated or thought they should be fired I know there are coaches out there who get away with stuff like this because the players and assistant coaches are too afraid to speak up. I usually find that if a team is successful and highly ranked then the chances of them reporting their coach is not very high but if a team is struggling and not so good then they are going to want to get someone new in there. Coaching isn’t easy and I believe you have to have a certain personality to be able to be great at it. You have to be able to understand and understand how your players take criticism because everyone is different. Sometimes players can be sensitive and feel attacked when a coach yells at them. It is a coach’s job to get their players to respond positively to criticism yet allow them to create thicker for themselves as time goes on.

    Jasmine Matthews

    ReplyDelete